The petitioners submitted that their prayer became infructuous. The High Court of Jammu and Kashmir disposed of the writ petition accordingly without recording reasons or substantive discussion.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 42
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
OWP No. 295/2012 (Through Audio Calling)
Haider Ali Begh and others …Petitioner(s)
Through:- Mr. F. S. Butt, Advocate. (Through Audio Call, 9419226286)
v/s
State of J&K and others ….Respondent(s)
Through:- None.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the prayer
made in the present petition has been rendered infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
Jammu 22.06.2020 Vijay Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No. Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No.
VIJAY KUMAR 2020.06.26 18:17 I agree to specified portions of this document
Haider Ali Begh and others
State of J&K and others
RAJESH BINDAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
