Pran Nath v. Farqqo Ahmed Factoo and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court held that the prayer in the contempt petition had become infructuous and discharged the petition consecutively.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 137
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
CPOWP No. 25/2012
(Through Audio Calling)
Pran Nath …Petitioner(s)
Through:- Mr. Sudershan Sharma, Advocate. (Through Audio Call, 9419127675)
v/s
Farooq Ahmed Factoo and others ...Respondent(s)
Through:- None.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayer
made in the present contempt petition has been rendered infructuous.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Pran Nath
- respondent
Farooq Ahmed Factoo and others
Coram
RAJESH BINDAL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court