This single-sentence order finds the petitioners' prayer in WP 172/2009 rendered infructuous, thereby dismissing the writ petition without elaboration or substantive reasoning.
Petition dismissed as the prayer was rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 96
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
SWP No. 172/2009 (O & M)
(Through Audio Calling)
Suresh Kumar and another …Petitioner(s)
Through:- Mr. Sudershan Sharma, Advocate. (Through Audio Call, 9419127675)
v/s
State of J&K and others ….Respondent(s)
Through:- None.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the prayer
made in the present petition has been rendered infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
Jammu 19.06.2020 Vijay Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No. Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No.
VIJAY KUMAR 2020.06.25 13:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Suresh Kumar and another
State of J&K and others
RAJESH BINDAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
