Petitioner withdrew the present petition stating satisfaction with relief already granted by the dependent. Court accepted the withdrawal and discharged the petition.
Petition withdrawn by petitioner; order dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 231
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
OWP No. 1640/2014 (O&M) (Through Video Conferencing)
Harminder Singh …Petitioner(s)
Through:- Mr. R.K. Gupta, Sr. Advocate with
Mr. Uday Bhaskar, Advocate
v/s
State of J&K and others ….Respondent(s)
Through:-
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE
ORDER
Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submitted that he has instructions to state that the petitioner does not wish to proceed further with the present petition and he is satisfied with the relief, which has already been granted to him by the department.
Ordered accordingly.
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
CHANDIGARH 15.09.2020 SUNIL-I
Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No
SUNIL KUMAR 2020.09.28 12:45 I agree to specified portions of this document
Harminder Singh
State of J&K
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
