This contempt petition alleging non-compliance of a previous order was dismissed as infructuous because the petitioner's claim had already been rejected during the petition's pendency, with liberty to challenge the rejection.
Petition dismissed as infructuous with liberty to impugn the order rejected by the authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 293
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
CPSW No. 736/2018 (O&M) In SWP No. 798/2013 (Through Video Conferencing)
Amit Gupta …Petitioner(s)
Through:- Mr. Anuj Dewan Raina, Advocate
v/s
Khurshid Ahmed Commissioner P.W.D. and others ….Respondent(s)
Through:- Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE
ORDER
of the order passed by this Court on 23.11.2017 in SWP No. 798/2013.
was to be considered.
CHANDIGARH 15.09.2020 SUNIL-I
| (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE |
|
|---|---|
| Whether the order is speaking | : Yes/No |
| Whether the order is reportable | : Yes/No |
SUNIL KUMAR 2020.11.03 13:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Amit Gupta
Khurshid Ahmed
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
