Dismissed

Hashmtullah Katoch and Ors. v. a.K.Gandotra,Chief Engineer,P.H.E.and Anr.

J&K HC15 Sept 2020CPSW/614/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order dismisses a contempt petition alleging non-compliance with a previous judgment of this Court. The Court found that the proceedings had become moot due to developments during pendency. The petitioners are given liberty to impugn the rejected orders if aggrieved.

What did the court decide?

The contempt petition is dismissed; liberty granted to impugn the rejected orders passed by the authority concerned.

Hashmtullah Katoch and Ors. Vs a.K.Gandotra,Chief… — Writ and Judicial Review | J&K HC (2020)

¶1

Serial No. 287

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU

¶3

CPSW No. 614/2018 (O&M) (Through Video Conferencing)

¶4

Hashmtullah Katoch and others …Petitioner(s)

¶5

Through:-

¶6

v/s

¶7

A.K. Gandotra, Chief Engineer, P.H.E and another

¶8

….Respondent(s)

¶9

Through:-

¶10

Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE

¶11

ORDER

¶12

The present contempt petition was filed alleging non-compliance of the order passed by this Court on 27.03.2018 in SWP No. 602/2018. In terms of the aforesaid order, the respondents were directed to consider the claim of the petitioners under rules in light of averments made in it annexures attached thereto.

¶13

In compliance of the aforesaid order, a compliance report dated 17.12.2018 has been filed wherein it has been stated that the case of the petitioners was considered and the same stands rejected vide detailed orders No. 04 of 2018 dated 07.12.2018 and order No. 48 E of 2018-19, dated 07.12.2018.

¶14

As the hearing of the cases now is being conducted through video conferencing, the required link for joining the video conferencing is being

¶15

2 CPSW No. 614/2018

¶16

circulated amongst all the lawyers. Besides this, the Bench Secretary/Reader are forwarding the link to all the Advocates, who contact them one day prior to the listing of their cases. For which specific note is being published in the Cause List. But despite this, none of the counsel has shown any interest.

¶17

Keeping in view the aforesaid development which has taken place during the pendency of the present contempt petition, nothing survives therein to be adjudicated upon. The same is accordingly, dismissed, however, with liberty to the petitioners to impugn the orders so passed by the authority concerned, in case they are aggrieved of the same.

¶18

(RAJESH BINDAL)
JUDGE
JAMMU
15.09.2020
SUNIL-I
Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No
Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No

¶19

SUNIL KUMAR 2020.11.03 13:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Hashmtullah Katoch and Ors. v. a.K.Gandotra,Chief Engineer,P.H.E.and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hashmtullah Katoch and Ors. v. a.K.Gandotra,Chief Engineer,P.H.E.and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bishan Dass Vs State Th.Revenue Deptt.and Ors.

Asha Rani Vs State Th.Home Deptt.and Ors.

M/S Surya Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Ors. Vs Uoi.Th.Ministry of Finance and Ors.

Amit Gupta Vs Khurshid Ahmed Comm.P.W.D.and Ors.

Mohd.Abdul Mutten Vs Ajit Kumar Sahu , Secy. Comm. Secy.Higher Education Deptt. and Ors.

Harminder Singh Vs State Th.P.W.D.and Ors.