Chander Vadan v. Alok Shukla,C.E.Pathankot and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
No. 143 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 143
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
CPSW No. 363/2014
(Through Audio Calling)
Chander Vadan …Petitioner(s)
Through:- Mr. Sudershan Sharma, Advocate. (Through Audio Call, 9419127675)
v/s
Alok Shukla, C. E. Pathankot and another ...Respondent(s)
Through:- None.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayer
made in the present contempt petition has been rendered infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
Jammu 22.06.2020 Vijay Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No. Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No.
VIJAY KUMAR 2020.06.26 15:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Chander Vadan
Alok Shukla, C. E. Pathankot and another
RAJESH BINDAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court