Dismissed
Sumit Kumar Padotra v. Khurshid Ahmad Comm.P.W.D. and Anr.
J&K HCCPSW/30/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
No. 304 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 304
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
CPSW No. 30/2019 (O&M) [CCP(S) No. 43/2019] (O&M) In SWP No. 886/2016 (Through Video Conferencing)
Sumit Kumar Padotra …Petitioner(s) Through:-.
v/s
Khurshid Ahmed Commissioner P.W.D. and another ….Respondent(s)
Through:- Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE ORDER
of the order passed by this Court on 15.02.2018 in SWP No. 886/2016.
was to be considered.
CHANDIGARH 15.09.2020 SUNIL-I
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No
SUNIL KUMAR 2020.09.28 12:45 I agree to specified portions of this document
Sumit Kumar Padotra
Khurshid Ahmed
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court