Dismissed¶11

Aarin Mahajan v. State of Hp

Himachal Pradesh HC14 Jul 2026CRMPM/977/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

HP High Court Shimla; Cr. MP(M) No. 977 of 2026; Aarin Mahajan v. State of H.P.; withdrawal of petition permitted under instructions of counsel; dismissed as withdrawn with pending miscellaneous applications; Judge Rakesh Kainthla; 14.07.2026; not approved for reporting.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn, along with pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. ¶11

Aarin Mahajan Vs State of Hp — Himachal Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

¶2

Cr. MP(M) No. 977 of 2026 Date of Decision : 14.07.2026

¶3

Aarin Mahajan		....Petitioner
	Versus
State of H.P.		....Respondent

¶4

Coram

¶5

Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge.

¶6

Whether approved for reporting? No

¶7

For the petitioner	: Ms. Advoc	Kusum ate.	Chaudhary,
For the respondent/State	: Mr.	Lokender	Kutlehria,
	Additi	onal Advocate	General.

¶8

Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral)

¶9

Learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions,

¶10

submits that she wants to withdraw the present petition. Permission granted.

¶11

In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.

¶12

(Rakesh Kainthla) Judge

¶13

14^th July, 2026 (Nikita)

Aarin Mahajan v. State of Hp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aarin Mahajan v. State of Hp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gyatari Devi Vs State of Hp

Sudhir Kumar Vs Branch Manager Kangra Central Co. Bank

Bodh Raj Vs Dina Nath

Arnav Saviraj Chauhan Vs State of Hp

Lalita Gurtu Vs Arvind Kumar

Ravinder Sharma Vs M/S Sars Hotels and Cottages (Registered Partnership Firm)