Madan Lal v. State of Hp and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Keywords: CWP No. 7820/2025; CWP No. 7822/2025; CWP No. 7824/2025; Madan Lal; Santosh Kumari; Dinesh Kumar; State of H.P.; ACP benefits; completion of 14 years of regular service; consequential benefits; instructions dated 09.08.2012, 07.07.2014 and 09.09.2014; pay fixation; arrears; interest @12%; pending representations; decide representation within six weeks; reasonable time; welfare State; Litigation Policy of the State; multiplication of litigation; court docket; CWPOA 5536 of 2020; Sanjay Kumar v. State of HP; Jyotsna Rewal Dua; Himachal Pradesh High Court Shimla; disposed of; miscellaneous applications disposed.
What did the court decide?
Respondents/competent authority directed to consider and decide the petitioners' representations in accordance with law within six weeks and to communicate the order so passed to the petitioner(s); pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand disposed of. No monetary relief awarded; the merits of the ACP and arrears claims were left to be examined while deciding the representations.