Dismissed¶6

Rooplal Sharma v. State of Hp and Others

Himachal Pradesh HC13 May 2025CWP/4180/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal of writ petitions as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh; withdrawal sought owing to enactment of The Himachal Pradesh Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Government Employees Act, 2024; CWP Nos.4178, 4180, 4476 & 4478 of 2025; High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla; Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J.; decision dated 13.05.2025; pending miscellaneous applications disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Writ petitions dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh in accordance with law, inter alia assailing The Himachal Pradesh Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Government Employees Act, 2024; pending miscellaneous applications disposed of. ¶6

Rooplal Sharma Vs State of Hp and Others — Himachal Pradesh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

¶2

CWP Nos.4178, 4180, 4476 & 4478 of 2025 Date of decision: 13.05.2025
1. CWP No.4178 of 2025 Kamlesh Kumari. ...Petitioner. Versus
State of HP and Ors. ...Respondents.
2. CWP No.4180 of 2025
Rooplal Sharma. ...Petitioner.
Versus
State of HP and Ors. ...Respondents.
3. CWP No.4476 of 2025
Sukh Devi & Ors. ...Petitioners. Versus
State of HP and Ors. ...Respondents.
4. CWP No.4478 of 2025
Naresh Kumar. ...Petitioner. Versus
State of HP and Ors. ...Respondents.
Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?¹
For the petitioner : Mr. Pankaj Thakur, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge

¶3

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that due to developments that have taken place, more specifically

¶4

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes

¶5

the enactment, i.e., The Himachal Pradesh Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Government Employees Act, 2024, the writ petitions, in their present form, cannot proceed ahead, therefore, the petitioners be permitted to withdraw the writ petitions with liberty to file afresh in accordance with law, inter alia , assailing the aforesaid enactment.

¶6

2. Prayer is accepted. Granting such liberty, present petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. Pending

¶7

miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

¶8

Jyotsna Rewal Dua 13^th May, 2025 Judge (Pardeep)

Rooplal Sharma v. State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rooplal Sharma v. State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prof. Arvind Kumar Agrawal Vs Union of India and Anr.

Rajgir Singh and Others Vs State of Hp and Another

Asha Rani Sharma Vs the State of Hp and Others

Krishni Devi Vs the State of Hp and Others

Pawan Kumar Verma Vs the State of Hp and Others

Suresh Kumar Sharma Vs State of Hp and Another