Ritaksha Butail v. the Mc Shimla and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Himachal Pradesh High Court, CWP No. 12802 of 2025, decided 07 August 2025, Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Petitioner Ms. Ritaksha Butail; respondent Municipal Corporation (notice confined to respondent No.1, accepted by Mr. Vivek Sharma, Advocate); petitioner represented by Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate. Petition disposed of with an observation binding in effect that upon the petitioner approaching the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Shimla under Section 259(2) of the Municipal Corporation Act, the Commissioner shall perform his statutory duty without any remiss. No precedent cited; no monetary relief.
What did the court decide?
Proceedings disposed of with the observation that if the petitioner approaches the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Shimla under Section 259(2) of the Municipal Corporation Act, the Commissioner shall perform his statutory duty without any remiss.