Om Raj v. Sameer Rastogi
Case brief
What is this about?
HP High Court Shimla; COPC No.827 of 2025 in CWP No.7290 of 2025; decided 06.08.2025; Justice Ajay Mohan Goel (single Judge, oral); petitioner Om Raj (counsel R.L. Chaudhary); respondent Shri Sameer Rastogi (counsel Anup Rattan, Advocate General, with Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General); subject: implementation of 'the judgment in issue' by the Authority concerned; undertaking by Additional Advocate General to pass appropriate orders within three weeks; statement taken on record; proceedings closed with liberty to revive; notices discharged; no statutes or precedents cited; no monetary quantum.
What did the court decide?
Liberty to the petitioner to seek revival of the proceedings if the Authority concerned does not pass appropriate orders in terms of the judgment in issue within three weeks. ¶10