Sunil Sood v. Rajiv Nangia
Case brief
What is this about?
Dismissal in default for want of prosecution; non-appearance of petitioner despite repeated calls on 05.03.2020 and 07.08.2025; vacation of interim order; pending miscellaneous applications disposed of accordingly; Himachal Pradesh High Court, Shimla; CMPMO; oral order by Ajay Mohan Goel, J.; no arguments addressed, no law laid down; respondent represented by senior advocate Ashok Sud with advocate Rajat; petitioner unrepresented.
What did the court decide?
The petition is dismissed in default for want of prosecution as none appeared for the petitioner despite repeated calls. ¶11