The appellant sought to withdraw the appeal. The court granted permission for withdrawal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn along with any pending miscellaneous applications.
Permission to withdraw the appeal granted; appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
LPA No. 146 of 2024.
Date of Decision : 3rd July, 2024.
Suresh Kumar . ...Appellant. Versus HRTC & Ors. ... .Respondents. Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice M. S. Ramachandra Rao, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?
For the Appellant: Mr. H.S. Rangra, Advocate. For the Respondents: Nemo.
M.S. Ramachandra Rao, Chief Justice (Oral)
Learned counsel for the appellant seeks to withdraw the appeal. Permission accorded.
( M.S. Ramachandra Rao) Chief Justice.
(Satyen Vaidya) Judge
3rd July, 2024. (jai)
Suresh Kumar
HRTC & Ors.
M. S. Ramachandra Rao
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
