This High Court Writ Petition was disposed of. The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing respondents to continue her in service until she reaches the age of 60 years, relying on a prior judgment.
Continued in service till she attains the age of 60 years.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. ( 2024:HHC:4341 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
CWP No. 2720 of 2024.
Date of Decision : 3rd July , 2024.
Shakutla Devi . ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ... .Respondents.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice M. S. Ramachandra Rao, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?
For the Petitioner: Mr. Mehar Chand, Advocate. For the Respondents: Ms. Priyanka Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General.
M.S. Ramachandra Rao, Chief Justice (Oral)
Heard both sides.
…2…
pending miscellaneous applications, if any.
( M.S. Ramachandra Rao) Chief Justice.
(Satyen Vaidya) Judge
3rd July, 2024. (jai)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be continued in service until she attains the age of 60 years as per previous judgment.
Shakutla Devi
State of H.P.
M. S. Ramachandra Rao
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
