Electricity Board withdrew its appeal, having implemented the Single Judge's order; LPA dismissed as withdrawn and pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. ( 2024:HHC:4348 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
LPA No. 117 of 2017 Date of decision: 03.07.2024
_______________________________________________________ The H.P. State Electricity Board …..Appellant. Versus Shyam Lal & others …Respondents _____________________________________________________ Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice M.S. Ramachandra Rao, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________ For the appellant : Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Satish Sharma and Mr. Bharat Thakur, Advocates. For the respondent: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rakesh Dhaulta, Mr. Sushant Kaprate, Mr. Gobind Korla, Additional Advocates General with Ms. Priyanka Chauhan & Mr. Arsh Rattan, Deputy Advocates General, for respondents no. 1 & 2. Mr. Udit Shaurya Kaushik, Advocate, for respondent no. 3.
M.S. Ramachandra Rao, Chief Justice (Oral)
Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant, on instructions, states that the appellant-Board does not wish to proceed with the LPA as they have implemented the order passed by the learned Single Judge vide Annexure A-11.
1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(M.S. Ramachandra Rao) Chief Justice.
July 03, 2024 (Satyen Vaidya) (hemlata) Judge.
(Satyen Vaidya)
The H.P. State Electricity Board
Shyam Lal
M.S. Ramachandra Rao
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
