Appellant sought permission to withdraw a first appeal with liberty to file afresh at an appropriate stage. The court allowed the withdrawal, disposing of the appeal without deciding any substantive issue.
Permission to withdraw appeal with liberty to file afresh at appropriate stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
FAO No. 8 of 2024 Date of Decision: 4.3.2024
_____________________________________________________________________ Shyam Lal
Premi Devi and Ors.
……...Appellant Versus …....Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the appellant: Mr. Paras Rana, Advocate vice Mr. B.R. Kashyap, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Nemo.
__________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to
withdraw the present appeal at this stage with liberty to file afresh at appropriate stage, if required and desired.
March 4, 2024 (Sandeep Sharma), (manjit) Judge
Shyam Lal
Premi Devi and Ors.
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
