Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh, which was granted. The petition was consequently dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw petition with liberty to file afresh at appropriate stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Cr.MP(M) No. 53 of 2024 Decided on 01.03.2024
_____________________________________________________ Imran Khan …….Petitioner Versus State of H.P. …..Respondent
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1
| For the petitioner | : | Mr. Harsh, Pathak, Ad |
Advocate vice Mr. Manoj vocate. |
|---|---|---|---|
| For the respondent | : | Mr. Manoj Mandhotra, |
Chauhan and Mr. Rajesh Additional Advocates |
| General. | |||
| __________________ Sandeep Sharma, Ju |
____ dge ( |
__________ oral): |
_____________________ |
Though respondent-State has already filed the status report, but learned counsel representing the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh at appropriate stage, if so required and desired. Ordered accordingly.
1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
2. Consequently, in view of the above, present petition
is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.
(Sandeep Sharma) Judge
1st March, 2024 ( reena)
Imran Khan
State of H.P.
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
