High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of a writ petition by directing the petitioner to file a representation before Respondent No.3, which must be decided within eight weeks after a personal hearing.
Liberty to file representation before Respondent No.3 within four weeks; Respondent to decide after hearing within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.184 of 2022
Date of Decision: 04.03.2024
____________ ___________________________________________ Kishan Chand …….Petitioner Versus Union of India & others … Respondents ______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1
For the Petitioner : Ms. Manisha Thamta, Advocate.
For the Respondents : Mr. Nand Lal Thakur, Senior Panel Counsel, for respondent No.1. Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C.Verma, Additional Advocate Generals, for respondent Nos. 2 and 3-State. Mr. Y.W.Chauhan, Advocate for respondents No. 4 to 6. Mr. Pushpinder Verma, Advocate, for respondent No.7.
_______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral):
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the interest
of justice this writ petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to make a representation to respondent No.3 with further direction to the said respondent to decide the representation in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible.
adverting to the issues raised in the petition on merit, this petition is
1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
closed, with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before respondent No.3 and in the event of any such representation being filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today, then respondent No.3 after giving an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner, shall decide the same within a period of eight weeks.
(Sandeep Sharma), Judge
March 04, 2024 (shankar)
Kishan Chand
Union of India
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
