Execution petitions by petitioners against HRTC were disposed of as infructuous after the respondents stated that they had complied with the earlier orders passed by the Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
Ex. Petitions No. 194 & 195 of 2024 Decided on: 8th May, 2024
Ex. Petition No. 194 of 2024
Rattan Lal and others .......Petitioners Versus HRTC and another ...Respondents Ex. Petition No. 195 of 2024 Sant Ram and others .......Petitioners Versus HRTC and another ...Respondents
Coram
| The Hon’ble Mr. Justice |
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, |
Judge. |
|---|---|---|
| The Hon’ble Mr. Justice | Sushil Kukreja, Judge. | |
| Whether approved for re | porting?1 | |
| For the petitioner(s): | Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advo | cate. |
| For the respondents: | Mr. Dheeraj K. Advocate. |
Vashisth, |
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral)
Learned counsel for the respondents fairly states that these petitions have been rendered infructuous inasmuch as the respondents have complied with the order passed by
1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
2
this Court. Accordingly, the petitions are disposed of as having
been rendered infuctuous.
( Tarlok Singh Chauhan ) Judge
May 08, 2024 ( Sushil Kukreja )
(naveen)
Judge
Rattan Lal and others
HRTC
Sant Ram and others
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Sushil Kukreja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
