The single-judge bench of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh found that the petitioner's claim for a payment had become infructuous since the amount had already been paid, and accordingly dismissed the petition.
The petition was disposed of as it had become infructuous since the dues had been paid.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Ex. Pet. No.187 of 2021 Decided on: 04.04.2024.
Rajinder Singh
....Petitioner
Versus
HRTC & Anr.
.…Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge
1 Whether approved for reporting? No.
| For the petitioner | : Mr. Shivendra Singh, Advocate. |
|---|---|
| For the respondents | : Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate. |
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the instant petition has been rendered infructuous, as the amount due and admissible stands paid to the petitioner.
Consequently, the instant petition is disposed of
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes
accordingly. Pending applications if any also stand disposed of.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge
(Sushil Kukreja) Judge
April 4, 2024 (subhash/vh)
Rajinder Singh
HRTC & Anr.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Sushil Kukreja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
