Dismissed
Mahesh Kumar v. State of Hp
Himachal Pradesh HCCWPOA/6370/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Kumar vs. State of H.P. and others. CWPOA…
What the court decided
AI extract
Kumar vs. State of H.P. and others. CWPOA…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Mahesh Kumar vs. State of H.P. and others.
CWPOA No. 6370 of 2020.
01.04.2024. Present:
None for the petitioner.
Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. I.N. Mehta, Mr. Yashwardhan Chauhan, Senior Additional Advocate Generals, Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Ms. Sharmila Patial, Additional Advocate Generals, Mr. J.S. Guleria and Mr. Raj Negi, Deputy Advocate Generals, for the respondents.
Despite repeated calls, none has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. Consequently, the Court is left with no other option, but to dismiss the petition for want of appearance and prosecution. Ordered accordingly.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge
(Sushil Kukreja) Judge
April 01, 2024. (krt)
Mahesh Kumar
State of H.P.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Sushil Kukreja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court