8. Per contra, Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, learned Senior counsel representing petitioner duly assisted by Mr. Sohail Khan, learned counsel, refuted the aforesaid submission of learned counsel representing Central Government counsel on the ground that bare perusal of information furnished by the petitioner in Attestation Form nowhere suggests that the petitioner ever furnished wrong information and there was no concealment on his part. While making this Court peruse Attestation Form (Annexure P-7), Mr. Bhushan, learned senior counsel representing petitioner contended that information with regard to criminal cases pending, if any, against the petitioner or punishment in the same was to be furnished in terms of columns given in Clause 15. He submitted that in none of the columns given in Clause 15 of Attestation Form, petitioner was under obligation to give details of FIRs, if any, registered against him. He submitted that though Clause 15 (c) and (d) suggest that the petitioner was to furnish information with regard to criminal case, if any, pending adjudication at the time of filling of Attestation Form, but respondents themselves in Attestation Form had provided for a stage, beyond which information was required to be submitted. Mr. Bhushan, learned senior counsel representing the petitioner, vehemently argued that
