Disposed

Sudhakar Sen and Anr. v. State of Hp and Ors.

Himachal Pradesh HC15 Mar 2024CWP/1252/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Civil Writ Petitions 1251 and 1252 of 2022, the High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of petitions by applying mutatis mutandis the relief granted in a prior judgment (Mohit Lath) regarding emoluments and regularization benefits.

What did the court decide?

The petitions are disposed of by ordering the respondents to apply the directions from the judgment in CWP No.787 of 2022 mutatis mutandis within four weeks.

Sudhakar Sen and Anr. Vs State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Himachal Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

¶2

Civil Writ Petition Nos.1251 and 1252 of 2022 Date of Decision: 15.3.2024

¶3

1. CWP No. 1251 of 2022

¶4

Shri Navjot Singh and Ors.

¶5

……...Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

State of Himachal Pradesh and others

¶8

…....Respondents

¶9

2. CWP No.1252 of 2022

¶10

Shri Sudhakar Sen and Anr.

¶11

……...Petitioners

¶12

Versus

¶13

State of Himachal Pradesh and others

¶14

…....Respondents

¶15

Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?

¶16

For the Petitioner: Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate.

¶17

For the respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General.

¶18

Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)

¶19

Learned counsel for the parties are ad-idem that case of the petitioners is squarely covered by the judgment dated 25.9.2023, passed by this Court in CWP No.787 of 2022, titled as Mohit Lath

¶20

and Ors v. State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors . alongwith connected matters, wherein this court disposed of the aforesaid writ petition holding the petitioners entitled to the emoluments in terms of the

¶21

¶22

rules framed in terms of clause-15(2) of the Rules dated 17.8.2020, alongwith benefit of regularization against the post in question in terms of the policy of regularization framed by the Government of Himachal Pradesh from time to time.

¶23

2. Having carefully perused aforesaid judgment passed in Mohit Lath (supra), this Court finds that issues raised in the instant petition(s) as well as reliefs, stand duly considered and granted to the similarly situate persons in the aforesaid petitions and as such, prayer made in the instant petition(s) deserves to be considered and decided in light of the afore judgment.

¶24

3. Consequently, in view of the above, the directions contained in the aforesaid judgment are ordered to be made mutatis mutandis applicable in the present cases for all intents and purposes. Needful shall be done by the respondents within four weeks from today. In the aforesaid terms, present petitions are disposed of alongwith pending application(s), if any.

¶25

March 15, 2024

¶26

(Sandeep Sharma), Judge

¶27

manjit

Sudhakar Sen and Anr. v. State of Hp and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sudhakar Sen and Anr. v. State of Hp and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Damodar Singh and Others Vs State of Hp and Others

Bionexy Pharma Vs Hpsebl and Others

Sarup Lal Upadhyay Vs State of Hp and Others

Hari Ram Vs State of Hp

Navjot Singh and Ors. Vs State of Hp and Ors.

Natraj Packaging Solutions Vs Hpsebl and Others