Petitioner sought regularization of services from the previous date citing a specific decision. The court, hearing the matter ex-parte at parties' consent, directed respondents to decide the matter within six weeks. Merits were not examined.
Directed respondents to consider petitioner's case in light of CWP No. 2343/2020 and decide within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 5348/2024 Decided on: 21.10.2024
Jodh Singh .…Petitioner Versus HRTC & Anr. ……Respondents
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1
| For the petitioner | : Mr. Bhishm Sharma, Advocate. |
|---|---|
| For the respondents | : Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate vice |
| Mr. Rahul Thakur, Advocate. |
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J
Though respondents have not filed the reply, however,
with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage.
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
No.2343/2020 (Vikram Singh & HRTC alongwith connected matters) decided on 09.11.2023.
The instant petition is disposed of, in above terms, so also the pending application(s), if any.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge
October 21, 2024 (Rohit)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's regularization case in light of the law laid down in CWPOA Nos. 2343/2020 within a time bound manner.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Vikram Singh & HRTC alongwith connected mattersReferred¶14
CWP No. 2343/2020 (Vikram Singh & HRTC alongwith connected matters)
Jodh Singh
HRTC
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
