Three writ petitions concerning HRTC were withdrawn by the petitioners at this stage with liberty to file fresh petitions if aggrieved in future; the court dismissed them as withdrawn with the liberty prayed for.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No.10944, 10948 and 10949 of 2024
Decided on: 21.10.2024
1. CWP No.10944 of 2024
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Raj Kumar ………..Petitioner Versus HRTC and Ors. ……..Respondents --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. CWP No.10948 of 2024 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dinesh Kumar ………..Petitioner Versus HRTC and Ors. ……..Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. CWP No.10949 of 2024 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dharmender Kumar ………..Petitioner Versus HRTC and Ors. ……..Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Rakesh Kumar and Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocates in all the petitions. For the Respondents: Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashisht and Mr. Vinod K. Gupta, Advocates in the respective petitions. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.
2
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) seeks permission to withdraw the petitions at this stage with liberty to file fresh at appropriate stage, in case the petitioner feels aggrieved and the necessity so arises in future.
Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall
also stands disposed of.
October 21, 2024 Ankit
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge
Raj Kumar
Dinesh Kumar
Dharmender Kumar
HRTC and Ors.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
