The petition, filed under CWP No. 3369 of 2022 in the High Court of Himachal Pradesh, was allowed to be withdrawn. The court dismissed the petition accordingly.
Permission to withdraw the petition granted; petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
CWP No. 3369 of 2022.
| Date of Decision : 12 th July, 2024. |
|---|
Kewal Ram Lothta .… Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ... .Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice M. S. Ramachandra Rao, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?
For the Petitioner: Mr. Jagan Nath, Advocate. For Respondents No.1 to 5: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rakesh Dhaulta, Addl. A.G. For Respondent No.6: Mr. Ravi Tanta, Advocate.
M.S. Ramachandra Rao, Chief Justice (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the
petition. Permission accorded.
the pending miscellaneous applications, if any.
( M.S. Ramachandra Rao) Chief Justice.
(Satyen Vaidya) Judge 12th July, 2024. (jai)
Kewal Ram Lothta
State of H.P.
M. S. Ramachandra Rao
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
