Appellant sought permission to withdraw the appeal; the High Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, along with pending miscellaneous applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
LPA No. 4065 of 2013. Date of Decision : 11th July, 2024.
Om Parkash . ...Appellant. Versus Suresh Kumar & Ors. ... .Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice M. S. Ramachandra Rao, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?
| For the Appellant: | Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate. |
|---|---|
| For Respondent no.1: | Ms. Bhawna Sharma, Advocate. |
| For Respondents no.2 to 4, | |
| 9 and 10: | Mr. Arsh Rattan, Deputy Advocate General. |
| For Respondent no.5: | Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate. |
M.S. Ramachandra Rao, Chief Justice (Oral)
Learned counsel for the appellant seeks to withdraw the appeal. Permission accorded.
the pending miscellaneous applications, if any.
( M.S. Ramachandra Rao) Chief Justice.
(Satyen Vaidya) Judge
11th July, 2024. (jai)
Om Parkash
Suresh Kumar
M. S. Ramachandra Rao
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
