subsequent writ petitions, bearing CWP Nos.733 of 2021 and 6429 of 2021, had been entertained for the reason that the allegations leveled therein were that while deciding petitioner’s application under Section 7-A(4) of the Act, i.e. the remedy preferred by it against the order dated 26.12.2019, the respondents had not complied with the principles of natural justice. Adequate opportunity of hearing was not accorded to the petitioner and the orders so passed by the respondents on the application moved by it under Section 7-A(4) of the Act were not reasoned. There cannot be any such allegation against the order now passed by the respondents on 03.03.2023 in compliance to the directions issued in the previous writ petitions of the petitioner. No such case was made out during hearing by learned counsel for the petitioner. In any case, the perusal of the order dated 03.03.2023 reflects that it is a detailed and reasoned order passed by the respondents rejecting the application moved by the petitioner under Section 7-A(4) of the Act after affording it due opportunity. It is for the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy as may be available to it in law against the basic order dated 26.12.2019 passed under Section 7-A(1) as also against the order dated 03.03.2023 passed under Section 7-A(4) of the Act, if so
