Application by the State seeking condonation of 157 days' delay in filing an appeal. The court found sufficient cause shown and allowed the application, condoning the delay and directing registration of the appeal.
Delay of 157 days in filing the appeal condoned; appeal to be registered and listed on 31.07.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
State of H.P. vs. Tara Chand and another.
Cr. M.P.(M) No. 968 of 2024.
10.07.2024. Present:
Mr. I.N. Mehta, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. Nalvesh Verma, Ms. Sharmila Patial, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Raj Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for the appellant.
Mr. Sunil Kumar Banyal, Advocate, for the respondents.
Cr. M.P.(M) No. 968 of 2024.
Mr. Sunil Kumar Banyal, Advocate, has put in appearance on behalf of the respondents by filing memo of appearance.
By medium of this application, the applicantappellant has sought condonation of 157 days’ delay that has crept up in filing of the appeal.
We have gone through the application and find that sufficient cause has been carved by the applicant-appellant, more particularly, in paras 2 and 3 of the application for condonation of delay. Accordingly, the application is allowed, delay of 157 days’ is condoned. Application stands disposed of.
Appeal be registered.
Cr. Appeal No. of 2024.
List for consideration on 31.07.2024.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge
(Sushil Kukreja) Judge 10th July, 2024. (krt)
State of H.P.
Tara Chand
Another
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Sushil Kukreja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
