Petitioner withdrew the petition with liberty to file afresh. Court granted permission and dismissed the petition as withdrawn, disposing of the matter.
Permission to withdraw with liberty to file afresh, if permissible, granted. Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr.MP(M) No.1830 of 2024 Date of Decision : 09.09.2024
| Amrik Singh Versus State of H.P. |
....Petitioner ....Respondent |
|---|---|
| Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? No |
| For the petitioner | : Mr. Shivans |
hu | Attri, Advocate, |
|---|---|---|---|
| vice Mr. Advocate. |
Vi | jender Katoch, | |
| For the respondent | : Mr. Ajit Shar General, for r |
ma, esp |
Deputy Advocate ondent/State. |
Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh. Permission granted. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to file afresh if permissible. The pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of.
(Rakesh Kainthla) Judge
09th September, 2024 (Nikita)
Amrik Singh
State of H.P.
Rakesh Kainthla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
