The petitioner's counsel withdrew the petition under instructions. The Court ordered the withdrawal accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.MMO No. 880 of 2024
Date of Decision: 09.09.2024
Vivek Sharma ... petitioner Versus Pawan Kumar Banyal ....Respondent
Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla , Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Paras Sharma, Advocate.
Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (oral)
After arguing the matter for some time, Mr. Paras
Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, submits that he wants to withdraw the present petition. Ordered accordingly.
( Rakesh Kainthla) Judge
9th September, 2024 (saurav pathania)
1
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
Vivek Sharma
Pawan Kumar Banyal
Rakesh Kainthla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
