An order in Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (Memorandum) No. 785 of 2024 where the High Court condoned a delay of 112 days in filing an appeal due to sufficient cause established by an affidavit, allowing the appeal to be registered.
Condonation of 112 days delay in filing appeal; appeal to be registered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
State of H.P. & another vs Harinder Singh & another
CMP(M) No.785 of 2024
Mr. Gobind Korla, Additional Advocate General, for the applicants/appellants.
20.11.2024 Present:
Mr. Rohan Tomar, Advocate, for the respondents.
CMP(M) No.785 of 2024
Despite opportunity, the respondents have not filed
reply.
By medium of this application, the
applicants/appellants have sought condonation of 112 days delay that has crept-up in filing of the appeal. A perusal of paragraphs 2(a) to 2(c) of the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, discloses sufficient cause which prevented the applicants/appellants from filing the appeal within the prescribed period of limitation. Accordingly, the aforesaid delay is condoned. The application stands disposed of. The appeal be registered.
LPA No._____ of 2024
List for consideration on 4th December, 2024.
( Tarlok Singh Chauhan ) Acting Chief Justice
( Satyen Vaidya ) Judge
November 20, 2024 (vt)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to condone a delay of 112 days in filing an appeal under section 374 CrPC
1 provisions across 1 enactments
State of H.P.
Harinder Singh
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
