The Acting Chief Justice disposed of this execution petition holding that the impugned judgment had been complied with; no further order or further proceedings were required.
No further orders; execution petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
| Execution Petition No. | 413 of 2024 | |
|---|---|---|
| Date of decision : 19.1 | 1.2024. | |
| Sudesh Kumar | ...Petitioner. | |
| Versus | ||
| State of H.P. & another | ...Respondents | |
| Coram: |
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Acting Chief Justice.
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Anil Jaswal, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.P. Singh, Addl. A.G.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Acting Chief Justice (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the judgment in question has been complied with. Therefore, no further orders are required to be passed in this case and the petition is accordingly disposed of alongwith pending applications, if any.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Acting Chief Justice.
(Satyen Vaidya) 19th November, 2024 Judge (kck)
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Sudesh Kumar
State of H.P.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
