Execution petition filed for implementation of an order stayed in a pending writ petition is closed and disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to extend existing remedies.
Petition closed and disposed of with liberty to petitioner to avail appropriate remedy if anything survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
Ex Petition (T) No. 84 of 2020 Decided on: 07.12.2023
________________________________________________________ Prem Lal ……….. Petitioner
Versus State of HP & Anr. …Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner : Mr. R.L Chaudhary, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Varun Chandel, Additional Advocate General.
Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge ( oral)
The present Execution Petition has been filed for implementation/ execution of order dated 02.03.2016 passed in OA No. 1470 of 2015.
(Vivek Singh Thakur) Judge
(Sandeep Sharma) Judge
(sunil)
1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
December 07, 2023
Prem Lal
State of HP
Vivek Singh Thakur
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
