Petitioner moved a compromise application to withdraw the pending writ petition. The High Court of Himachal Pradesh accepted the prayer, dismissed the petition as withdrawn, and disposed of the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWPOA No. 6413 of 2020
Date of Decision : December 07, 2023
Manav Singh Pathania
...Petitioner.
Versus
H.P.S.E.B. Ltd. & Ors.
...Respondents.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge.
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner : Mr. Tek Chand, Advocate.
For the respondent : Mr. Lakshay Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No. 1 and 2.
Mr. Lokender Paul Thakur, Senior Panel Counsel, for respondents No. 3 and 4.
Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Baldev Negi, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No. 5.
Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge (Oral)
CWPOA No. 6413 of 2020 & CMP-T No. 857 of 2023
The petitioner has moved CMP-T No. 857 of 2023 with a prayer to permit him to withdraw the present petition.
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of
in the same terms.
(Vivek Singh Thakur) Judge.
(Sandeep Sharma) Judge.
December 07 , 2023 (PK)
Manav Singh Pathania
H.P.S.E.B. Ltd.
Vivek Singh Thakur
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
