In a compounding of cognizable offence matter, the petitioner appeared via counsel but was unrepresented. The court dismissed the petition as defaulted and for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Ranjeet Singh v. HPKVV
CWPOA No. 6177 of 2020
06.12.2023 Present:
Nemo for the petitioner.
Mr. Prince Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No.2.
Notice issued to the petitioner stands duly served, but he has not chosen to pursue the matter as there is no representation on his behalf. It appears that petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter.
Accordingly, present petition is dismissed in
default as well as for non-prosecution.
( Vivek Singh Thakur ), Judge
( Sandeep Sharma ), Judge
December 06, 2023
manjit
Ranjeet Singh
Respondent No.1
Respondent No.2
Vivek Singh Thakur
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
