The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of a writ petition regarding payment of DCRG and leave encashment, finding the matter complied with and the petitioner at liberty to approach other forums for remaining grievances.
The petition stands disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
Ex. Pet. No. 85 of 2023 Decided on: 14.06.2023 Sh. Desh Raj …Petitioner Versus HRTC & Anr. …Respondents
Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1No.
For the Petitioner : Mr. Anubhav Chopra, Advocate.
For the Respondents : Mr. Ajay Kumar Chauhan, Advocate.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral)
Notice. Mr. Ajay Kumar Chauhan, Advocate, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes
2
case, the petitioner has still any other grievance(s), he is at liberty to avail the remedy as available to him under the law.
applications, if any.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge
(Satyen Vaidya) 14th June, 2023 Judge (sanjeev)
Sh. Desh Raj
HRTC
Anr.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
