The Court disposed of an original proceeding by noting that the petitioner had already been ordered transferred due to a promotion vacancy, rendering no further order necessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CWP No. 1879 of 2023
Anil Kumar Vs. State of HP & anr.
12.7.2023 Present:Mr. M.L. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, with Mr. I.N.Mehta and Mr. Y. W. Chauhan, Sr. Additional Advocates General, Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Ms. Sharmila Patial, Additional Advocates General and Ms. Priyanka Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for respondentsState.
The order in question has been complied with inasmuch
as the petitioner has now been ordered to be transferred to GHS Ropari, District Hamirpur against vacancy being caused due to promotion of the incumbent posted there. Therefore, no further order is required to be passed and the matter is closed.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge
(Satyen Vaidya) Judge 12th July, 2023 (Guleria)
Anil Kumar
State of HP & anr.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
