Petitioner sought withdrawal of a writ petition with liberty to file remedial applications. The High Court allowed the prayer and dismissed the petition.
Permission to withdraw the petition with liberty reserved to avail such remedy as available under the law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 3819 of 2023
Decided on: 14.06.2023
Jaiwant Sharma .…Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents.
State of Himachal Pradesh and others
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner : Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Anup Rattan,Advocate General with Mr.Ramakant Sharma, Ms. Sharmila Patial, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition with liberty reserved to the petitioner to avail such remedy as available to him under the law. Prayer being innocuous is allowed.
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
as withdraw with liberty, as prayed for.
shall also stand disposed of.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge
(Satyen Vaidya) Judge
14th June, 2023
(sushma)
Jaiwant Sharma
State of Himachal Pradesh and others
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
