Petitioner filed execution petitions for commercial decrees. The court observed receipt of installments per an undertaking and disposed of petitions as partly satisfied, reserving liberty to refile on default.
Petitions disposed as partly satisfied; liberty reserved to file fresh petitions on default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Execution Petition No. 15 of 2017 a/w Execution Petition No. 6 of 2018
Date of decision : 2.8.2023.
| 1. | Execution Petition No. 15 of 2017 | |
|---|---|---|
| M/s G-Tech Splicing Pvt. Ltd |
...Petitioner. | |
| Versus | ||
| M/s Simplex Infrastructure Ltd. | ...Respondent | |
| 2. | Execution Petition No. 6 of 2018 | |
| M/s G-Tech Splicing Pvt. Ltd. | …Petitioner | |
| Versus | ||
| M/s Simplex Infrastructure Ltd. | ….Respondent |
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : Ms. Veena Sharma, Advocate, For the respondents : Mr. Subhash Sharma, Advocate.
Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral)
Learned counsel for the decree holder has submitted that the installment of Rs. 40,00,000/-, issued for the months of June and July, 2023 have been paid to the decree holder in terms of the undertaking given by the judgment debtor before this Court on 12.6.2023.
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
-2-
(Satyen Vaidya) 2nd August, 2023. Judge (kck)
-3-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether execution petitions should be disposed of given payment of installments under an undertaking.
M/s G-Tech Splicing Pvt. Ltd.
M/s Simplex Infrastructure Ltd.
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
