HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO…
Petition allowed as infructuous; prayer allowed; petition dismissed; pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No. 308 of 2023 Date of decision : 1.8.2023. Pankaj Kumar & others ...Petitioners. Versus State of H.P. & others ...Respondents
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge .
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioners : Mr. P. S. Goverdhan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Addl. A.G. with Mr. Gautam Sood, Mr. Rahul Thakur and Ms. Priyanka Chauhan, DAGs, for the respondents.
Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral):
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he is under instructions to withdraw the present petition, as the same has been rendered infructuous due to intervening circumstances. Prayer being innocuous is allowed. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed as infructuous. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(Satyen Vaidya) 1st August, 2023 Judge (kck)
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
-2-
Pankaj Kumar
State of H.P.
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
