Manish Kumar v. the State of Hp and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP…
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 2498 of 2023
Decided on: 02.08.2023
Manish Kumar
.…Petitioner.
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors.
…Respondents.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
| For the petitioner | : | Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Ankit Dhiman, Advocate. |
|---|---|---|
| For the respondents | : | Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Mr. Gaurav Sood, Mr. Rahul Thakur and |
| Ms. Priyanka Chauhan, Deputy Advocate Generals. |
||
| : | Mr. Gambhir Singh, Advocate, for respondent No. 4. |
Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral)
Learned counsel for the parties have
jointly submitted that due to intervening
circumstances, the subject matter of the petition has been rendered infructuous.
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
orders are required to be passed in this petition.
dismissed as having become infructuous.
(Satyen Vaidya) 2nd August, 2023 Judge (sushma)
Manish Kumar
State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors.
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court