Dismissed
Suresh Kumar v. State of Hp
Himachal Pradesh HCCWPOA/5001/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
CWPOA No. 5001 of 2020 Decided on: March 2, 2023
| ________________________________________________________ Sauresh Kumar Sharma ………..Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another ….Respondents |
|---|
| ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ________________________________________________________ |
| For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate |
For the Respondents : Mr. Anoop Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol and Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General. ________________________________________________________ |
Sandeep Sharma, Judge
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that with flux of time, present petition has been rendered as infructuous, as such, same may be disposed of accordingly.
(Sandeep Sharma) Judge March 2, 2023 (vikrant)
1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Sauresh Kumar Sharma
State of Himachal Pradesh
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court