Petitioner sought regularization of services as a clerk. Court found issue already adjudicated in prior coordinate bench judgment. Directed respondents to decide case in light of that precedent within four weeks.
Respondents directed to consider petitioner's case in light of Harsh Gupta judgment within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
CWP No. 4472 of 2020 Decided on: March 2, 2023
Sandeep Sharma, Judge
By way of instant petition, petitioner has prayed for the following main reliefs:
1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
3
petitioner is found to be similarly situate to the case of Harsh Gupta , same benefit shall be granted to her. Needless to say, authority concerned while doing the needful in terms of instant order shall afford an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner and pass detailed speaking order thereupon. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate Court of law, if he still remains aggrieved. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(Sandeep Sharma) Judge
March 2, 2023 (vikrant)
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Harsh Gupta vs. Secretary Urban Development and othersReferred¶16
CWP No.3877 of 2011
Smt. Vidya Devi
State of Himachal Pradesh
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
