The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed the petitioner's writ petition for want of prosecution due to the death of the original petitioner, rendering the records defective. No further proceedings could be initiated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 615/2010 Decided on: 16.09.2023. Mangal Singh ...…Petitioner Versus HPSEB ……Respondent
Versus HPSEB ……Respondent …………………………………………………………………………………. Coram
Ms. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner : None.
For the respondent : Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
There is no appearance for the petitioner. Court notice issued to the petitioner has been received back with the report that the original petitioner has expired. In this background, the matter cannot be proceeded any further. The records have become defective.
of prosecution and for the reason that the records have become defective. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge
16th September 2023 (rohit)
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Mangal Singh
HPSEB
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
