This execution petition was disposed of as satisfied because the due and admissible interest amount to the petitioner had been paid and the judgment was duly complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Ex.(P) No. 53/2023 Decided on: 15.09.2023
Raksha Devi …Petitioner
Versus State & Ors. ....Respondents.
………………………………………………………………………… Coram
Ms. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioners : Mr. Rajesh Verma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Ms. Seema Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 4.
Mr. Rangil Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.5.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J
Learned Deputy Advocate General submitted that
due and admissible amount towards interest has already been paid to the petitioner.
respondents and the submission made by learned counsel for
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes
2
the parties that the judgment in question stands duly complied with, this execution petition stands disposed of as satisfied. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge
15th September, 2023
(rohit)
Raksha Devi
State
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
