Disposed

Surinder Kumar v. the State of Hp and Others

Himachal Pradesh HC11 Oct 2023CWP/5975/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of multiple Civil Writ Petitions without examining merits. Respondents were directed to consider the petitioners' cases and decide via a speaking order within eight weeks, following the decisions in Madan Lal and Prem Sukh cases.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to consider petitioners' cases and pass a speaking order within eight weeks from the date of judgment.

Surinder Kumar Vs the State of Hp… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Himachal Pradesh HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

¶2

CWP Nos. 5966, 5967, 5968, 5969, 5970, 5971, 5972, 5973, 5974, 5975, 5976 & 5977 of 2023

¶3

	Date of decision : 1	1.10.2023.
1.	CWP No. 5966 of 2023.
	Ajeet Kumar Sharma	….Petitioner.
	Versus
	State of H.P. & others	…Respondents.
2.	CWP No. 5967 of 2023
	Parshotam Lal	...Petitioner.
	Versus
	State of H.P. & others	...Respondent.
3.	CWP No. 5968 of 2023
	Bahadur	….Petitioner.
	Versus
	State of H.P. & others	…Respondents.
4.	CWP No. 5969 of 2023
	Ram Parshad	…Petitioner
	Versus
	State of H.P. & others	…Respondents
5.	CWP No. 5970 of 2023
	Parshotam Lal	…Petitioner
	Versus
	State of H.P. & others	…Respondents.
6.	CWP No. 5971 of 2023
	Darshan Kumar	…Petitioner
	Versus
	State of H.P. & others	…Respondents
7.	CWP No. 5972 of 2023

¶4

-2-

¶5

	Bhupinder Mohan & another	….Petitioners
	Versus
	State of H.P. & others.	…Respondents
8.	CWP No. 5973 of 2023
	Suresh Kumar & another	…Petitioners
	Versus
	State of H.P. & others	…Respondents.
9.	CWP No. 5974 of 2023
	Shashi Pal	…Petitioner
	Versus
	State of H.P. & others	…Respondents
10.	CWP No. 5975 of 2023
	Surinder Kumar	…Petitioner
	Versus
	State of H.P. & others	…Respondents
11.	CW No. 5976 of 2023
	Jit singh & others	…Petitioners
	Versus
	State of H.P. & others	…Respondents
12.	CWP No. 5977 of 2023
	Kapil Dev	…Petitioner
	Versus
Cor	State of H.P. & others. am:	…Respondents

¶6

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge .

¶7

Whether approved for reporting?¹ For the petitioners : Mr. Parav Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Addl. A.G.

¶8

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶9

-3-

¶10

Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral):

¶11

Notice. Learned Additional Advocate General

¶12

accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the case of the petitioners is squarely covered by the judgments passed by this Court in CWP No. 9791 of 2013, titled as, Madan Lal vs. State of H.P. & others and CWPOA No. 6582 of 2019, titled as, Prem Sukh vs. State of H.P. & others. He further submits that petitioners shall be content in case the respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioners in a time bound manner in light of judgments ibid .

¶14

Accordingly, the petitions are disposed of without making any comments on the merits of the case of the petitioners. It is directed that respondents shall consider the case of the petitioners in light of judgment passed by this Court in CWP No. 9791 of 2013, titled as, Madan Lal vs. State of H.P. & others and CWPOA No. 6582 of 2019, titled as, Prem Sukh vs. State of H.P. & others, within eight weeks from today and will decide the same by passing a speaking order. In case, the petitioners are found similarly situated as petitioners in CWP No. 9791 of 2013, titled as, Madan Lal vs. State of H.P. & others and CWPOA No. 6582 of 2019, titled as, Prem Sukh vs.

¶15

-4-

¶16

State of H.P. & others, they will also be granted the same benefits as granted to petitioners in above referred case. Pending miscellaneous application, if any, also stand disposed of.

¶17

11^th October, 2023 (kck)

¶18

(Satyen Vaidya) Judge

Surinder Kumar v. the State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Surinder Kumar v. the State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jogi Ram Vs the Kangra Central Cooperative Bank Ltd. and Others

Rajeshwari Sen Vs State of Hp and Others

Champa Devi Vs Nand Lal Kaushal

Chetna Kumari Vs Bhakra Beas Management Board and Ors.

Vipan Kumar Vs Bhakra Beas Management Board and Ors.

Ram Parshad Vs State of Hp and Others