Petitioner prayed for dismissal as the subject matter has become infructuous due to intervening circumstances. Court dismissed the petition as inructuous and disposed of any pending applications.
Petition dismissed as infructuous; pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
Civil Writ Petition No. 2910 of 2023.
Date of decision: 10th October, 2023.
Rajeshwari Sen ...Petitioner.
Versus
State of H.P. & Ors. ... .Respondents. Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the Petitioner: Mr. Vikas Rathore, Advocate. For the Respondents/State. : Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Addl. A.G., with Ms. Priyanka Chauhan and Mr. Rahul Thakur, Dy. A. Gs. For Respondent No.3 : Mr. Sharthak Mehta, Advocate.
Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral).
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
due to intervening circumstances, the subject matter of the petition has been rendered infructuous.
(Satyen Vaidya) Judge 10th October, 2023. (jai)
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Rajeshwari Sen
State of H.P.
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
